"Climate change attribution is the study of whether, or to what degree, human influence may have
contributed to extreme climate or weather events. Scientists can now estimate whether human
activities have influenced extreme weather or climate events and changed how likely they are to
occur. This is known as the science of climate change attribution.
Attributions of extreme weather to human-induced climate change may affect how policymakers,
organizations, and individuals understand and manage associated risks, with the potential benefit of avoiding future costs.
The interpretation and evaluation of attribution findings have been part of the discussion of policy on wildfires, heat waves,
climate change, and disaster responses, among other issues. Understanding the attribution process and its uncertainties may
be helpful in understanding the potential uses and limitations of climate attribution claims.
Before the development of extreme event attribution methods, there was a scientific consensus that, while attribution of
global climate trends was possible, attribution of individual events was not possible. This changed with the development of
statistical methods to determine the likelihood that human influence had changed the frequency or severity of extreme events,
and a better understanding of the connections between components of the Earth’s climate system.
Several approaches to extreme event attribution have been developed, including a risk-based approach, which seeks to
estimate human-influenced changes in the probability of an extreme event, and a storyline approach, which seeks to estimate
the relative contribution of specific natural and human causes to an extreme event. The two approaches use many of the same
analytic tools. Researchers may study different aspects of the same event, or use differing yet valid analytic methods and find
results that seem inconsistent.
Numerous attribution studies have been completed on a wide range of extreme events, including heavy rainfall, heat waves,
sea ice extent, consecutive dry days, droughts, and others. Results have included instances where changes in event probability
were attributed to human influence, instances where evidence of human influence was not found, and instances where the
results were inconclusive. For example, a study of record high May 2017 temperatures in South Korea found that the
increased probability of such an event was due to human influence, while a study of a 2011 drought/heat wave in Texas did
not find evidence of human influence. In recent years, domestic litigation has been brought by states and municipalities
seeking compensation for damage caused by adverse climate impacts. Extreme event attribution may become important in
this type of litigation in order to establish liability..."
Climate Change
Tuesday, June 6, 2023
Is That Climate Change? The Science of Extreme Event Attribution
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment