"Major changes have occurred in campaign finance policy since 2002, when Congress
substantially amended campaign finance law via the Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act (BCRA).
The Supreme Court’s 2010 ruling in Citizens United and a related lower-court decision,
SpeechNow.org v. FEC, arguably represent the most fundamental changes to campaign finance
law in decades. Citizens United lifted a previous ban on corporate (and union) independent
expenditures advocating election or defeat of candidates. SpeechNow permitted unlimited
contributions supporting such expenditures and facilitated the advent of super PACs. Although
campaign finance policy remains the subject of intense debate and public interest, there have been
few recent major legislative or regulatory changes. During the 114th Congress, two bills
substantially devoted to campaign finance policy have advanced beyond introduction. The
Committee on House Administration reported H.R. 412, which would terminate the presidential
public financing program. In addition, the committee ordered reported H.R. 4734, which would
permit candidates to name someone other than the treasurer to disburse funds if the candidate
dies. In activity somewhat related to campaign finance policy, provisions in the FY2016
consolidated appropriations law (P.L. 114-113; H.R. 2029) prohibited some additional reporting
requirements surrounding contributions and expenditures. (See also related bills H.R. 2995, S.
1910, and S. 2132.) FY2017 bills (H.R. 5485; S. 3067) also contain provisions related to
campaign finance..."
Campaign finance
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment