Fiscal Stress Faced by Local Governments
"Local governments—including counties, cities, towns, school districts, and special districts—play a significant role in people’s lives and in the nation’s economy. In 2009, the expenditures of local governments equaled 8.7 percent of gross domestic product, and those governments employed just over 9 percent of the labor force. That year, local governments as a group cut their spending in real (inflation-adjusted) terms. This year and in upcoming years, they expect to constrain spending and services—primarily because of reductions in state aid and falling revenues. In particular, revenues from property taxes are poised to decline to reflect lower property values. To the extent that local governments address budget gaps by reducing spending or raising taxes, such changes will partially counteract the federal government’s fiscal support for the economy.
In light of those developments, this Congressional Budget Office (CBO) issue brief describes the economic conditions and budgeting practices that can lead to significant budgetary challenges—often termed fiscal stress—at the local level..."
Showing posts with label local_governments. Show all posts
Showing posts with label local_governments. Show all posts
Friday, December 10, 2010
Monday, October 11, 2010
Authority of State and Local Police to Enforce Federal Immigration Law
"The power to prescribe rules as to which aliens may enter the United States and which aliens may
be removed resides solely with the federal government, and in particular with Congress.
Concomitant to its exclusive power to establish rules which determine which aliens may enter and
which may stay in the country, the federal government also has the power to sanction activities
that subvert this system. Congress has defined our nation’s immigration laws in the Immigration
and Nationality Act (INA), a comprehensive set of rules for legal immigration, naturalization,
work authorization, and the entry and removal of aliens. These requirements are bolstered by an
enforcement regime containing both civil and criminal provisions. Deportation and associated
administrative processes related to the removal of aliens are civil in nature, while certain
violations of federal immigration law, such as smuggling unauthorized aliens into the country,
carry criminal penalties.
Congressional authority to prescribe rules on immigration does not necessarily imply exclusive
authority to enforce those rules. In certain circumstances, Congress has expressly authorized
states and localities to assist in enforcing federal immigration law. Moreover, there is a notion that has been articulated in some federal courts and by the executive branch that states may possess “inherent” authority to assist in the enforcement of federal immigration law, even in the absence of clear authorization by federal statute. Nonetheless, states may be precluded from taking actions that are otherwise within their authority if federal law would thereby be thwarted..."
"The power to prescribe rules as to which aliens may enter the United States and which aliens may
be removed resides solely with the federal government, and in particular with Congress.
Concomitant to its exclusive power to establish rules which determine which aliens may enter and
which may stay in the country, the federal government also has the power to sanction activities
that subvert this system. Congress has defined our nation’s immigration laws in the Immigration
and Nationality Act (INA), a comprehensive set of rules for legal immigration, naturalization,
work authorization, and the entry and removal of aliens. These requirements are bolstered by an
enforcement regime containing both civil and criminal provisions. Deportation and associated
administrative processes related to the removal of aliens are civil in nature, while certain
violations of federal immigration law, such as smuggling unauthorized aliens into the country,
carry criminal penalties.
Congressional authority to prescribe rules on immigration does not necessarily imply exclusive
authority to enforce those rules. In certain circumstances, Congress has expressly authorized
states and localities to assist in enforcing federal immigration law. Moreover, there is a notion that has been articulated in some federal courts and by the executive branch that states may possess “inherent” authority to assist in the enforcement of federal immigration law, even in the absence of clear authorization by federal statute. Nonetheless, states may be precluded from taking actions that are otherwise within their authority if federal law would thereby be thwarted..."
Monday, November 24, 2008
State, Local Governments Get More Say in Federal Environmental Decision-Making
"Answering the call of state and local governments to give them more involvement in the development of federal environmental rules, EPA has a new policy to broaden its consulting efforts with intergovernmental partners when new regulations and policies cost more than $25 million each. This is a significant lowering of the previous consultation threshold of $100 million."
"Answering the call of state and local governments to give them more involvement in the development of federal environmental rules, EPA has a new policy to broaden its consulting efforts with intergovernmental partners when new regulations and policies cost more than $25 million each. This is a significant lowering of the previous consultation threshold of $100 million."
Wednesday, November 5, 2008
Federal, State, and Local Governments Finances of Selected State and Local Government Employee Retirement Systems
"A quarterly survey that provides national summary data on the revenues, expenditures, and composition of assets of the largest public employee retirement systems."
"A quarterly survey that provides national summary data on the revenues, expenditures, and composition of assets of the largest public employee retirement systems."
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)