Showing posts with label banking. Show all posts
Showing posts with label banking. Show all posts

Wednesday, March 3, 2021

Banking Policy Issues in the 117th Congress

"Over the past 14 years, banking has experienced significant events and changes and has regularly been the subject of policymaker initiatives and debates. In response to the 2007-2009 financial crisis, Congress—primarily through the 2010 Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (Dodd-Frank Act; P.L. 111-203)—and bank regulators, using new and existing authorities, increased bank regulation. While some observers view those changes as necessary and effective, others argued that certain regulations were unjustifiably burdensome. To address those concerns, the 2018 Economic Growth, Regulatory Relief, and Consumer Protection Act (P.L. 115-174) relaxed certain regulations. Opponents of that legislation argue that it unnecessarily pared back important safeguards, while proponents of deregulation argue that additional measures are needed. More recently, the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has created unprecedented economic conditions that could stress the banking industry. As a result, the 117th Congress faces many issues related to banking, including:
 

Safety and soundness.

Banks are subject to prudential regulations designed to reduce the likelihood of bank failures, and banks face certain rules about how they should value their assets and account for losses. In addition, anti-money-laundering requirements aim to block transactions involving criminal proceeds. Banks are also required to take steps to avoid cyberattacks. The extent to which these regulations are effective and appropriately balance benefits and costs is a matter of debate.

Consumer fairness and access.

Certain laws are designed to protect consumers and ensure that lenders use fair lending practices. Generally, policymakers balance consumer protection, credit access, and industry costs when considering consumer protection laws and regulation and encourage access to banking services for disadvantaged consumers. In addition, one bank regulator has revised its Community Reinvestment Act (CRA, P.L. 95-182) regulatory framework while the other two regulators have not, raising concern that the CRA could be implemented inconsistently.

COVID-19 effects and policy responses.

The COVID-19 pandemic has impaired the ability of millions of businesses and individuals to make repayments on their bank loans. Furthermore, the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security (CARES) Act (P.L. 116-136) will have direct or indirect effects on banks. Congress may examine questions related to stress in the banking industry, the expiration of loan forbearances and of bank regulatory relief granted pursuant to the CARES Act, and the regulatory implications of bank asset growth caused by the pandemic and policy responses to it.

Community banks.

The number of small or “community” banks has declined substantially in recent decades. No consensus exists on the degree to which the removal of regulatory barriers to interstate branching and banking, market forces, and regulatory burden are causing the decline. Because these institutions are considered important sources of credit, Congress may consider policies to support them. ..."
Banking 

Sunday, June 21, 2020

COVID-19 and the Banking Industry: Risks and Policy Responses

"The Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has caused widespread economic disruption. Millions of businesses were forced to shut down and unemployment soared. The weakened economic conditions are likely to have implications for the financial system, including for banks and the banking industry. Many bank assets are loans to households and businesses, and banks rely on the inflow of repayments on those loans to make profits and meet their obligations to depositors and creditors. If repayments suddenly decline, banks can become distressed and potentially fail. Bank failures can be especially disruptive to the economy because they remove an important credit source for communities, and the financial system can become unstable if failures are widespread. Banks can absorb unanticipated losses on loans, to a point, by writing down the value of the capital. Thus, two key factors in how well banks weather the adverse economic effects of COVID-19 are (1) how concentrated their assets are in loans to households and businesses, and (2) how much capital they hold to absorb losses.

Bank data reported as of December 31, 2019, suggest the industry as a whole is relatively well-positioned, compared with recent history, to endure losses on household and business loans. In general, banks hold high levels of capital, largely due to changes in bank regulation and behavior made in response to the 2007-2009 financial crisis. However, certain segments of the industry, such as banks holding high concentrations of household loans, business loans, or both, are more exposed to losses and have less capital relative to those exposures than the industry as a whole. For example, household and business loans make up more than 70% of total assets for 535 banks (roughly, about 1 in 10 banks). These banks, on average, have less capital buffer relative to the size of those loans than most banks. By one metric, 87 banks are in danger of becoming seriously distressed..."
COVID-19 and banking

Wednesday, March 29, 2017

Youth Banking Resource Center

"The FDIC is sharing resources to encourage banks and schools to work together to improve the financial skills and experiences of youth. Financial education and school-based savings programs introduce young people to financial services at an early age, while helping youth learn how to manage their money more effectively. Youth savings programs not only encourage the development of savings habits at a formative age, but also have the potential to promote economic inclusion for entire families.
A research report from the U.S. Treasury Department concluded that having a bank account boosts the effect of financial education instruction on students. The report also said that in schools where there was a branch of a federally-insured financial institution, students had more positive attitudes towards banks and were more likely to have a bank account...."
Youth and banking

Thursday, March 10, 2016

FDIC Highlights New Resources for Bank Customers on Precautions When Using Computers and the Internet Cybersecurity publications announced as part of National Consumer Protection Week

"The Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) announced new resources today to educate bank customers about appropriate steps they can take to help avoid fraud and other cyber threats when banking online or on their mobile devices. The information is being issued in advance of National Consumer Protection Week, March 6-12.
As part of an ongoing effort to highlight safe online banking strategies, the FDIC released two new cybersecurity brochures today aimed at consumers and business customers of financial institutions. The brochures include tips to help users protect and maintain their computer systems and data. In addition to expandedcybersecurity information available online, the FDIC also released a special edition of the quarterly newsletter FDIC Consumer News featuring precautions consumers can take at home and when banking remotely using laptops, desktops, smartphones, and other mobile devices.
While federally insured financial institutions are required to have vigorous information security programs to safeguard financial data, financial institution customers and businesses also need to know how to steer clear of potential fraudulent situations. The FDIC is using National Consumer Protection Week as an opportunity to remind bank customers about taking appropriate cybersecurity precautions..."
Cybersecurity

Friday, June 27, 2014

Banking Organization Systemic Risk Report

"The Federal Reserve Board today announced the availability of data that can be used to evaluate the individual systemic footprint of 33 large U.S. bank holding companies.  The data will help to ensure comparability when evaluating the systemic risk profile of each banking organization.

The data cover five categories often used when considering the potential systemic risk of a banking organization: size; interconnectedness; complexity; substitutability, which is a measure of how easily a firm's activities can be replaced by another firm; and cross-jurisdictional activity, which includes foreign liabilities and claims..."

Banks, banking

Monday, March 18, 2013

Federal Reserve Bulletin

For research data on banks and banking, take a look at the Federal Reserve Bulletin. This site provides full-text of the monthly issues of the bulletin from 1996 to the present.
Federal Reserve Bulletin

Monday, November 12, 2012

2013 capital planning and stress testing program

"The Federal Reserve Board on Friday launched the 2013 capital planning and stress testing program, issuing instructions to firms with timelines for submissions and general guidelines. The program includes the Comprehensive Capital Analysis and Review (CCAR) of 19 firms as well as the Capital Plan Review (CapPR) of an additional 11 bank holding companies with $50 billion or more of total consolidated assets...
2013 Capital Planning and Stress Testing Program

Thursday, December 3, 2009

FDIC National Survey of Unbanked and Underbanked Households
"In January 2009, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) sponsored a special supplement to the U.S. Census Bureau’s Current Population Survey (CPS) to collect national, state, and metropolitan statistical area (MSA) data on the number of U.S. households that are unbanked and underbanked, their demographic characteristics, and their reasons for being unbanked and under-
banked...

• An estimated 7.7 percent of U.S. households, approximately 9 million, are unbanked. At least 17 million adults reside in these unbanked households...

• The proportion of U.S. households that are unbanked varies considerably among different racial
and ethnic groups, with certain racial and ethnic minorities more likely to be unbanked than the
population as a whole. Minorities more likely to be unbanked include blacks (an estimated 21.7 percent of black households are unbanked), Hispanics (19.3 percent), and American Indian/Alaskans (15.6 percent). Racial groups less likely to be unbanked are Asians (3.5 percent) and whites (3.3 percent)..."