"In May 2022, this Court suffered one of the worst
breaches of trust in its history: the leak of a draft opinion.
The leak was no mere misguided attempt at protest. It was
a grave assault on the judicial process. To meet our obligations as judges, we accept submissions from parties and
amici, we engage advocates at oral argument, and we publish explanations of our final decisions. All of this we do in
the open. Along the way, though, it is essential that we deliberate with one another candidly and in confidence. That
phase of the judicial process affords us an opportunity to
hone initial thoughts, reconsider views, persuade one another, and work collaboratively to strengthen our collective
judgment. It is no exaggeration to say that the integrity of
judicial proceedings depends on the inviolability of internal
deliberations.
For these reasons and others, the Court immediately and
unanimously agreed that the extraordinary betrayal of
trust that took place last May warranted a thorough investigation. The Chief Justice assigned the task to the Marshal of the Supreme Court and her staff. After months of
diligent analysis of forensic evidence and interviews of almost 100 employees, the Marshal’s team determined that
no further investigation was warranted with respect to
many of the “82 employees [who] had access to electronic or
hard copies of the draft opinion.” Marshal’s Report of Findings & Recommendations 11 (Jan. 19, 2023). In following
up on all available leads, however, the Marshal’s team performed additional forensic analysis and conducted multiple
follow-up interviews of certain employees. But the team
has to date been unable to identify a person a preponderance of the evidence. Id., at 17. A public version of the Marshal’s report is attached.."
Supreme Court Leak Investigation
Friday, January 20, 2023
SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES STATEMENT OF THE COURT CONCERNING THE LEAK INVESTIGATION
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment