"On May 24, 2022, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit issued a decision in Cawthorn v.Amalfi, a case involving Section 3 of the Fourteenth Amendment (Section 3). That constitutional
provision bars certain people who have “engaged in insurrection or rebellion against” the United States
from holding specified state and federal government offices. The specific question in the case was
whether a Reconstruction-era statute granting amnesty to former Confederates barred application of
Section 3 to persons who engage in any future rebellion or insurrection. The Fourth Circuit held that the
1872 statute did not have that effect and instead lifted the constitutional disqualification only for acts that
had already occurred. The decision is relevant to Congress, both because Section 3 has been invoked
against several legislators who allegedly participated in or supported the January 6, 2021, unrest at the
Capitol and because the case raises broader constitutional considerations about what role state officials,
federal courts, and Congress can play in determining the eligibility of congressional candidates.
Section 3 and the 1872 Amnesty Act
Section 3 of the Fourteenth Amendment provides, in its entirety:
No person shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress, or elector of President and VicePresident, or hold any office, civil or military, under the United States, or under any State, who,
having previously taken an oath, as a member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States, or
as a member of any State legislature, or as an executive or judicial officer of any State, to support
the Constitution of the United States, shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the
same, or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof. But Congress may by a vote of two-thirds of
each House, remove such disability.
Ratified after the Civil War, Section 3 was intended to bar individuals who had held government office
before the war and then sided with the Confederacy from holding certain state or federal offices. Section 3
was occasionally invoked against former Confederates during the Reconstruction Era, but the provision
also sparked opposition. Some viewed it as overly harsh or ineffective; others objected to the practical burden it placed on Congress to consider removing the office-holding bar on an individual basis. In 1872,
Congress enacted a statute known as the 1872 Amnesty Act, which provided:
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in
Congress assembled (two-thirds of each house concurring therein), That all political disabilities
imposed by the third section of the fourteenth article of amendments of the Constitution of the
United States are hereby removed from all persons whomsoever, except Senators and
Representatives of the thirty-sixth and thirty-seventh Congresses, officers in the judicial, military,
and naval service of the United States, heads of departments, and foreign ministers of the United
States.
The 1872 Amnesty Act granted broad amnesty to many people who would otherwise be barred from
office under Section 3, but it did not apply to certain groups whose participation in the Confederacy was
deemed particularly culpable. Congress later enacted additional legislation granting amnesty to some of
the excluded officials..."
Insurrection Bar
No comments:
Post a Comment