"In the days after Russia’s invasion of Ukraine on February 24, 2022, many countries condemned the action as a violation of international law governing when countries may use force against one another. Since then, several observers, including the U.S. Secretary of State and other foreign government officials, have cited evidence that the Russian military has targeted civilians, struck protected sites, and taken other actions that violate international law regulating the conduct of war. This Legal Sidebar provides a brief introduction to the international legal framework governing the use of force in the invasion of Ukraine and concludes with a discussion of avenues for accountability and options for Congress.
Terminology
The law of war generally refers to the portion of international law that regulates the inception of use of
force, the conduct of hostilities, and the protection of war victims, among other things. The term is often
used interchangeably with the law of armed conflict and international humanitarian law. There are two
major categories under the law of war umbrella: jus ad bellum (legal rules governing when a country can
resort to use of force) and jus in bello (law governing conduct during the use of force). While they can be
interrelated, jus ad bellum and jus in bello generally operate independently such that compliance with one
category is required regardless of compliance with the other. For example, a state that is a victim of a jus
ad bellum violation because it is attacked without a lawful basis must still comply with jus in bello when
conducting military operations to defend itself.
Jus ad Bellum: Deconstructing the Justifications for War in Ukraine
The starting point to analyze most aspects of jus ad bellum is the U.N. Charter. Article 2(4) prohibits
member-states from using or threatening to use force against one another, but there are exceptions. Article 51 preserves member-states’ right to act in either individual or collective self-defense when an armed
attack occurs, and Chapter VII of the charter permits the U.N. Security Council to authorize military
actions necessary to maintain or restore international peace and security. A state can also consent to the
use of force in its territory.
Customary international law (described in this CRS Report) also informs jus ad bellum. Customary
international law requires that the use of force be proportionate to the justification for military action and
necessary because no other reasonable means of redress are available..."
Law of War and Russia
No comments:
Post a Comment