"On June 15, 2020, the Supreme Court issued a decision in a series of cases brought by gay and
transgender workers alleging that their employers violated Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (Title
VII) by discriminating against them “because of . . . sex.” The Court held 6-3 in Bostock v. Clayton
County, Georgia that Title VII forbids employers from firing an individual for being gay or transgender.
The Court’s decision in Bostock was consolidated with two other cases, Altitude Express, Inc. v. Zarda
and R.G. & G.R. Harris Funeral Homes, Inc. v. EEOC. (An earlier Sidebar addresses lower courtdecisions in these cases and provides further background on Title VII.)
This Sidebar explains the Court’s holding in Bostock and highlights some potential implications of the
decision for other areas of the law, including the “bona fide occupational qualification” (BFOQ)
exception in Title VII; constitutional exceptions and religious-based exemptions to Title VII; various
aspects of Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972 (Title IX); and statutes that incorporate Title
IX’s requirements, such as the Affordable Care Act..."
Supreme Court, gays and transgender
Sunday, June 21, 2020
Supreme Court Rules Title VII Bars Discrimination Against Gay and Transgender Employees: Potential Implications
Labels:
Boston_v._Clayton_County,
CRS,
gays,
Supreme_Court,
Title_V11,
Transgender
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment